What is the mortgage Relief plan ??
Specifically, loan servicers and investors will eat the cost of getting the borrower’s payment down to that debt-to-income ratio threshold. Then the government will jump in and subsidize the cost of cutting the ratio even further to 31%. Servicers will generally use interest rate reductions and term extensions to get the payments lower.
Borrowers don’t have to be delinquent already to qualify, a departure from previous modification programs. But they have to be owner-occupants. No second home owners or investors need apply. The loans also can’t be too large. They have to be for less than the current Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conforming loan limits — $417,000 nationally, and up to $729,750 in specific areas designated “high cost.”
The rate relief isn’t permanent, either. Borrowers will only get cheaper rates for five years, after which time their rate will gradually become reverse to a level in line with the market. And in no circumstance will the servicer be allowed to cut a borrower’s rate below 2%.
You might be wondering: Yeah, so what? Loan modifications have been going on for several months, and it hasn’t had much impact.
That’s true. The difference now is that the government is going to subsidize them in an attempt to make them more aggressive and more widespread.
Specifically, servicers will get a $1,000 upfront fee for each modification they put in place. They also stand to collect fees of up to $1,000 every year for three years if the borrower can stay current on his loan.
That’s not the only money flowing from Washington …
Servicers also get an incentive payment of $500 if they modify loans BEFORE borrowers miss payments.
Mortgage investors get $1,500 for that, too.
Borrowers who stay put in their homes and make payments on their modified loans, rather than walk away, can collect $1,000 a year for five years in principal reduction payments.
Finally, the Treasury Department and FDIC will establish a $10 billion insurance fund. The fund will distribute payments to mortgage investors if home prices keep falling.
The Financial Stability Plan is designed to reduce the number of foreclosures…
The idea is to encourage more servicers and investors to allow modifications, rather than move straight to foreclosure out of fear home prices will keep dropping.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Ramp Up Their Refinance Role
There’s another major component to this plan designed to help borrowers, whose homes have lost value, refinance …
Currently, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac generally can’t buy or guarantee loans that are made at a loan-to-value ratio of 80% or more. In other words, you have to have at least 20% equity in your home to qualify. But falling home prices have eroded the equity of millions of borrowers, making many of them ineligible to refinance despite the fact mortgage rates are relatively low.
Enter the Obama plan.
It will permit Fannie and Freddie to refinance mortgages they already hold — or that they put into MBS — as long as the new loans (including any fees) don’t amount to more than 105% of the current value of the underlying homes.
Borrowers can participate in this program if they have a second mortgage, but only if the second mortgage lender agrees to stay in second position. The refi loans will feature fixed rates with terms of 15 or 30 years, with no prepayment or balloon payments. Applications will be accepted after March 4, when technical details of the program are hammered out.
To help Fannie and Freddie ramp up their mortgage market role, the Treasury Department will double the amount of money it has committed to inject into the two companies — to as much as $400 billion from $200 billion. The two firms will also be allowed to increase the size of their retained loan portfolios to $900 billion from $850 billion.
There are a few other miscellaneous components to this plan as well …
For starters, from here on out all banks receiving Financial Stability Plan (the new name for TARP) aid will be forced to implement a uniform loan modification program. The government will seek to apply any modification program to FHA and VA loans, in addition to conventional loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie and Freddie.
Meanwhile, the Obama administration will back legislative efforts to allow bankruptcy judges to cram down mortgage balances.
Specifically, the administration wants any legislation to allow judges to treat the portion of a mortgage amount that exceeds the current value of the borrower’s home as unsecured debt. Courts routinely slash unsecured debt loads as part of the bankruptcy process.
Last but not least, the Hope for Homeowners plan — which has been a total dud, resulting in only a handful of loans — will be modified. The FHA will cut fees that borrowers have to pay and loosen standards so that borrowers with higher debt burdens can qualify, among other steps.
So Where Are the Flaws in This Plan?
If you buy the administration’s line, these efforts will help 7 million to 9 million families either restructure their loans or refinance them. It will also prevent house prices from declining an additional $6,000 (above and beyond the declines they’re already experiencing).
Me?
I think those projections are way too optimistic — and I’ll tell you why.
First, as I mentioned earlier, the modification plan only applies to owner occupied homes with loans less than the conforming loan limit. Some 40% of existing homes sold during the peak of the bubble — 2005 — were purchased as second homes or investment properties, according to the National Association of Realtors. Those borrowers won’t get any relief. Neither will “jumbo” borrowers who have larger loans — loans that are experiencing their own delinquency surge.
I understand why those loans are being excluded. Politicians don’t want to be perceived as bailing out speculators or rich people. But it also limits the plan’s impact as any foreclosures in those parts of the mortgage market won’t be mitigated by this plan.
Second, home prices in the hardest-hit housing markets (where foreclosures are most prevalent) have plunged. They’ve dropped so much, in fact, that even the more generous 105% LTV refinance standard won’t help many borrowers.
Just look at what’s going on in my own backyard, Palm Beach County, Florida. Let’s say you bought a median priced home in the West Palm Beach market in December 2005, around the peak. It would have cost you $408,200, according to figures from the Florida Association of Realtors.
Now let’s be generous and assume you put 10% down, rather than financed the whole shebang (which many people did). You would have had to cough up $40,820 and finance $367,380 — leaving you with a mortgage with an initial loan-to-value ratio of 90%. Thirty-year fixed rates averaged about 6.3% at the time, so your principal and interest payment would have come to $2,274.
But in the three years since then, home prices have plunged — to just $246,000 as of December 2008. In other words, your home has lost $162,000 in value, or 39.7%. During that same three-year period, you would have only paid your mortgage principal down to $353,739 (less than $14,000).
Bottom line: Thanks to the plunge in home prices, and the slow payoff of loan principal you get with a traditional 30-year mortgage, your loan-to-value ratio shot up from 90% to a mind-boggling 144%! That means the new Fannie and Freddie LTV cap of 105% doesn’t mean squat. You still can’t refinance.
Moreover, that $5,000 principal pay down subsidy you might get as part of the Obama plan pales in comparison to the $162,000 decline in value you’ve suffered.
And here’s something else to chew on: If you assume prices instantly stop falling, turn around, and then climb 5% per year from their December 2008 level in this example, guess how long it would take to get back to even (your original purchase price)?
Give up?
How about more than 10 years — sometime in 2019!
You could do this same exercise for many of the horror story markets in California, Arizona, Nevada, and elsewhere. With borrowers so deeply underwater, the new refinance standards — as generous as they are — won’t help. Nor will the small incentive payment encourage many borrowers to stay put.
Result: We’re going to see tons of “walk aways” and “jingle mail” — homeowners abandoning their homes and mailing their keys to their lenders — despite the Obama plan.
That brings me to my biggest complaint about this plan: It still doesn’t attack the principal reduction issue head on. Multiple studies and analyses I’ve seen confirm that reductions in borrower loan balances increase the success rate on modifications. It deals with the “I’m hopelessly underwater so why should I keep making payments, even if they’re cheaper” problem.
Yet lenders are fighting that approach tooth and nail, and principal reductions are NOT a central part of the Obama plan. Instead, loan term extensions and rate reductions will be the main technique used to reduce payments to the 38% and 31% thresholds.
Unless and until principal reductions move front and center, redefault rates on modifications will remain extremely high. That means many of today’s modifications will be tomorrow’s foreclosures.
What It All Means to You …
For all its flaws, the Obama plan could help you if you’re a borrower at risk of defaulting on your loan — or if you’re already heading toward foreclosure. The plan won’t fully be in place until early March. But you may want to go ahead and contact your loan servicer now to discuss your options.
The servicer should also be able to tell you if your loan is owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. If you got a conventional, plain vanilla 30-year fixed mortgage, chances are you’re in that category. That would make you eligible to refinance under the new, more generous collateral value standards, but only if you fit in the 80% to 105% LTV bracket.
And what if you’re an investor? Does this mean it’s safe to wade into housing and banking stocks? No, not in my opinion. For all the reasons I spelled out earlier, I don’t think this program will have the hoped-for impact.
Like every other program before it, it will help some borrowers and some lenders avoid some foreclosures. But it won’t be a cure all. And it won’t have a significant impact on home prices. I expect them to continue to fall this year and into 2010, given the very large overhang of property on the market and rising unemployment.
Something else really sticks in my craw here — something I’ve talked about before. The government could end up subsidizing mortgage borrowers, lenders, and servicers to the tune of more than $10,000 for each case as part of this program.
I want to know:
How exactly is that fair to borrowers who played by the rules … who didn’t buy too much house … and who continue to pay their loans on time? Why are they left out in the cold? That’s what many Americans are going to be asking, and what many politicians are going to be hearing from callers.
Lastly, I have to question whether preventing foreclosures is a good idea in the first place. Maybe it sounds callous. But foreclosures are the market’s way of moving overpriced homes saddled with too much debt into the hands of new, more stable owners. These new buyers can pay drastically-reduced prices, which allow them to buy with traditional 30-year fixed-rate loans instead of all the Frankenstein Financing that was popular between 2004 and 2007.
Note:
This article supplied by Michelle Morris of Coldwell Banker Home Loans
